Steve Kostecke wrote: > This discussion dates back to August, 2002. > > Please see > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.protocols.time.ntp/msg/3387eda49518407a?dmode=source > The argument there seems to be not that ntpdate is worse than SNTP, but that there is an implied promise that it is almost as good as ntpd. The reason for having SNTP is to have something which has no pretensions of being anything other than crude.
_______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
