David Woolley wrote: > David J Taylor wrote: > >> Isn't the 128ms a worst-case estimate, because NTP would set the >> time by stepping initially if the appropriate parameter is >> specified? Wouldn't the initial offset then be near zero? > > I meant the largest representable value less than 128ms, which for the > purposes of looking at startup transients can be approximated to > 128ms.
OK, but isn't it likely that the initial setting is much closer than 128ms, after the first step has been made? David _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
