Hi there
Ryan Malayter wrote: > On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 2:48 PM, Unruh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> That may be what you expect, but you can get it 1usec (1 micro second). > > Is there something wrong with the mail gateway and Unicode? I posted > my message as text/plain with charset=UTF-8, which has been an IETF > standard for more than a decade. And my message does, in fact, appear > correct with UTF-8 characters such as "l" I see a 'l' (006C) here. > (Greek Small Letter Mu, > Unicode 03BC) in the list archives at: > https://lists.ntp.org/pipermail/questions/2008-October/020235.html Charsets contradict; 'META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"' The transport charset is ISO-8859-1. Transport overrules content. However, non ascii is encoded as '&#ddd;', where 'ddd' is de decimal Unicode value, so non ascii is legible anyway. > However, all replies to my message were in 7-bit charset="us-ascii", > which of course mangles the non-ASCII chasracters. > > So is it the pipermail gateway that is not Unicode compliant, Does it just convert mail to news? On news to mail as well? So what does this look like? Euro: € mu: µ z-caron: ž > or is it > the MUAs of the respondents that is at fault? If it is the list > itself... well, isn't it absurd to restrict content of a mailing list > to 7-bit us-ascii? It is 2008, not 1988. Post 1999 software should support UTF-8. Regards, Rob _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
