David Woolley <[email protected]> writes: >Russell, David wrote:
>> >> I am suspicious of a particular implementation, especially since one problem >The point of having a reference implementation for an RFC is that the >reference implementation is the definitive definition of the algorithm, >i.e. the reference implementation is correct, by definition. Well, you do need to moderate that statement. Surely bugs are possible in the reference implimentation, and those bugs do not define the algorithm. >You still have a problem that you need the NTPV3 reference >implementation, or better, you need to implement NTPv4. _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
