[email protected] wrote: > On Feb 6, 7:23 am, Dave Hart <[email protected]> wrote: >> It's running with a patch to lock the main and timer threads to the >> 2nd CPU using SetThreadAffinity. I haven't tried locking the async I/ >> O thread as well, but I will now. It's also running with a patch to >> the interpolation code which is more selective about baseline counter/ >> time pairs it uses. There is a faster server on the same LAN I could >> try as well, but I figured slower is better for understanding how bad >> the user-mode PPS implementation is. >> >> Cheers, >> Dave Hart > > Under windows OS, I believe working in the 10's of microsecod range is > pretty good, and a darn site better than flat NMEA. Terje, can you > let me know what is bad about this?
Oh, it is indeed _very_ good! When I wrote my reply I simply didn't consider getting such good results under Windows, i.e. I assumed FreeBSD or Linux. Mea Culpa! Dave: You're doing great! Terje -- - <Terje.Mathisen at tmsw.no> "almost all programming can be viewed as an exercise in caching" _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
