On Feb 27, 1:15 am, I wrote: > As a test I fiddled with the set of internet servers carefully to > minimize clockhopping to generally cause 1 msec or less steps and > overall manage to stay within +/- msec of the changing sources. With
Sorry I meant "stay within +/- 2 msec" regarding that marginally stable LAN source. Looking at a machine on a different network with a refclock, I noticed a +/- 100 usec sawtooth with a 4 hour period: http://davehart.net/ntp/refclock/20090227-refclock-dirty-sawtooth.jpg Cheers, Dave Hart _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
