David J Taylor wrote: > Dave Hart wrote: > [] >> The 150us offsets are while slewing to try to catch up with the 3ppm >> frequency shift as the heat comes on. I have to imagine a Windows PC >> with a more stable oscillator (lower temperature coefficient to >> frequency) would do better, though I'm not deluding myself that it >> would match the performance of FreeBSD, with its advantage of knowing >> the precise relationship between the counter and the system clock. > > Yes, it would be nice to have a more stable crystal in that system. > Agreed on the comparison with FreeBSD. Isn't there an NTP simulator where > someone could model jitter and offset against a 2.5ppm sinusoidal or > triangular frequency swing?
Just build the NTP simulator that comes with the NTP sources. There are config options you need to build this. Danny -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
