>>> In article <[email protected]>, "Richard B. >>> Gilbert" <[email protected]> writes:
> Harlan Stenn wrote: >> If you connect directly to an S1 server and that server goes insane, you >> are screwed. If you connect to a well-configured S2 server you have a >> lot better confidence that you'll be getting useful time. I recommend >> you have as many of your machines as possible/reasonable peer with each >> other. Richard> Does this really help unless each peer has at least one unique Richard> source of time? I'm thinking of failure cases - it should leave a really big clique that will outvote an insane server. It would be interesting to document various failure cases and see if we can come up with a BCP document to describe these. -- Harlan Stenn <[email protected]> http://ntpforum.isc.org - be a member! _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
