ScottyG <[email protected]> wrote: > To do this the order in which market data was received and trades > transmitted need to be maintained. I do know from their current log > files that 1 ms is not fine enough for this and that on occasion .1 > ms is not good enough.
In broad handwaving terms, isn't 100ns more or less a cache miss on a processor today? Yes, some are less then that some are more but O(100ns) seems about right. rick jones -- I don't interest myself in "why." I think more often in terms of "when," sometimes "where;" always "how much." - Joubert these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway... :) feel free to post, OR email to rick.jones2 in hp.com but NOT BOTH... _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
