Ulrich, Wonderfully rude of you to point that out, but you are absolutely correct. I have no interest whatsoever in maintaining NTPv3, which so far as I am concenred has been obsolered by NTPv4 since 1998. The IETF has bottled up the NTPv4 spec for almost four years; I would be very interested in errata reports on the draft, but it has been reviewed by dozens of follks and I have responded to each and every one. As for rfd1305, if somebody spots an errort, please report and post an errata update. I am not interested in doing that myse.
Dave Ulrich Windl wrote: >Brian Utterback <[email protected]> writes: > > > >>When you think that there is a mistake in an RFC, it is wise to check the RFC >>errata list at http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_list.php >> >> > >In a recent conversation with Dave about clarifications on RFC 1305 he >said he will put no energy into setting up errata for that RFC. Just to >let you know... > >Ulrich > >_______________________________________________ >questions mailing list >[email protected] >https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions > > _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
