"Maarten Wiltink" <maar...@kittensandcats.net> writes: >"Unruh" <unruh-s...@physics.ubc.ca> wrote in message >news:k8yxm.46291$db2.44...@edtnps83... >[...] >> No idea what "spread spectrum " means for a clock.
>That there is a certain jitter explicitly introduced in its >effective frequency. Probably in the form of a random offset, >that averages to zero, to every tick, so you're certain that >the long-term frequency doesn't change. I am afraid I am left as confused as before. HOw introducing random offsets would stop the frequency from changing I have no idea. It sounds like a terrible idea, but that may be ignorance. >Groetjes, >Maarten Wiltink _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
