In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... > > David Woolley writes: > > EMI is at submultiples of the raw FSB side because instruction rates > > and loop rates also introduce strong periodic elements. > > I wrote: > > Which spread-spectrum (especially real spread spectrum, less so mere FM) > > mitigates. > > David Woolley writes: > > The problem is that it only mitigates it down to the statutory levels, > > which are way too high for weak signal reception. > > Then your beef is with the statutory levels, not the methods of > achieving them. Personally, I'll take white noise over a pure tone > right in my passband any day (not that you will get white noise from the > triangle-wave FM that Dr. Mills tells me the manufacturers are using to > fake SS).
I can filter out a "pure tone" no problem, I can't filter out broadband white noise. That with my communications kit. Spread spectrum communications can tolerate a few steady interfering carriers, but cannot often tolerate another spread spectrum interferer. DJB _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
