In article <hb57u6$26...@news.eternal-september.org>, 
n...@blacklist.anitech-systems.invalid says...
> 
> Unruh wrote:
> > BlackLists writes:
> >> For anyone that cared enough about emissions,
> >>  (and not about price) they could always get a
> >>  EMSEC / TEMPEST, Level A / 1, PC.
> >
> >> {I've worked on a few TEMPEST PCs (decades in the past),
> >>   it often takes 15 minutes of removing shielding panels
> >>   just to get to where you can remove the shielded container
> >>    a component (e.g. hard drive) is inside.
> >
> >
> > In one case to make it so that it does not destroy other
> >  people's enjoyment of their system, and the other to make
> >  sure a determined adversary cannot make use of yours.
> > Different boxes for different folks.
> 
> Both are aimed at stopping unintentional emissions.
> 
> Sure a TEMPEST PC would far exceed CE EMC / FCC Part 15 B, ...
> 
>  However weren't a few posts just complaining that those
>   standards were not strict enough.
> 
>   TEMPEST is just stricter unintentional emission standards.

In essance yes, but there are other parts of it too, in regards to 
trying not to create any likely usable EMI that may leak out...

DJB

_______________________________________________
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
      • Re: [... Dave Baxter
        • R... E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists
          • ... Unruh
            • ... Rick Jones
              • ... E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists
              • ... Unruh
              • ... Gele Quest
              • ... David Woolley
              • ... E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists
              • ... Unruh
              • ... Dave Baxter
              • ... Michael Deutschmann
              • ... E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists
              • ... Rick Jones
  • Re: [ntp:quest... David Malone
  • Re: [ntp:quest... Frans Grotepass

Reply via email to