On 2009-12-01, Michael Butow <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 01 Dec 2009 00:18:11 +0000, unruh wrote: > >> So why in the world do you have them listed as servers for each other if >> you do not want them acting as servers for each other? > > I have no problem with them acting as servers for each other in the case > where one of them still has contact to the outside. > In fact, in that case, the other one _must_ continue to get the time from > its partner.
_______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
