David Mills wrote:

Not true. The dispersion does increase, but the server is valid until the dispersion exceeds the select threshold, usually in four or five more missed messages.

That's why I said the quality measures are invalidated, rather than the server is invalidated. I probably should have said "effectively". I guess that anti-clock hopping may reduce the effect.

I was really trying to correct my initial reading, that the only reachability check was reachability == 0. There is also a reachability & 7 == 0 check, earlier in the code, which results in a sample with the maximum possible dispersion value being loaded.

I can't tell, quickly, what gets loaded when there are only one or two missed polls. I'd always assumed that the filter slots tracked the rachability ones, but maybe not.

_______________________________________________
questions mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
      • Re: [... E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists
        • R... David Woolley
          • ... David Woolley
        • R... Michael Moroney
          • ... David Woolley
            • ... Rick Jones
              • ... Danny Mayer
              • ... David Woolley
            • ... David Woolley
              • ... David Mills
              • ... David Woolley
          • ... unruh
      • Re: [... David Woolley
        • R... E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists
          • ... David Woolley
            • ... E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists
              • ... David Woolley
          • ... David Woolley
  • Re: [ntp:quest... David Woolley

Reply via email to