Martin Burnicki <[email protected]> wrote: >> Is that really correct as even I can tell 0.977 is less than the >> "minimun" 1.000 ms" in the previous line? > > I think 1 ms is just the nominal value and 0.977 is due to rounding errors > or an inexact measurement interval.
I thought the timer interval was 1/1024 Hz? _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
