In article <[email protected]>, David Woolley <[email protected]> writes: >Hal Murray wrote: > >> >> Description here: >> http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~mills/ntp/html/accopt.html >> >> Would somebody who uses restrict please check to see if this >> does what you want. >> > >I'm not convinced that the people who try to use restrict on pool >servers really know what they want! I think they are trying to blindly >apply a "when in doubt block" policy, without really thinking about the >fact that they are opening themselves up to random, untrusted, servers >by using the pool in the first place, and that they are already >protected from unsolicited associations.
Could we fix that by improving the documentation? >Unfortunately, it is often not them that is enforcing the policy (and >therefore not them that could evaluate the appropriateness of restrict >server. I assume anybody serious about needing good time will pick servers they trust and use autokey. (and/or setup their own refclocks) -- These are my opinions, not necessarily my employer's. I hate spam. _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
