David L. Mills <[email protected]> wrote: > Rob, > > With due respect, I don't think you know what you are talking about.
Read it again. I don't question your design, I question your claims that the code implements the design which are upheld even when the contrary is shown in observations. Even when your design is perfect and your belief is firm, there can still be bugs. _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
