David Woolley <[email protected]> wrote: > Rob wrote: > >> >> What nearly all of them do is send a query at the specified (or fixed) >> interval, and put the time from the reply packet in the clock, stepping >> it to that value. >> >> Maybe it cannot be rightfully called SNTP, but it is what we have. > > The SNTP supplied with the reference implementation (4.2.5p32) seems > close to that. It spreads the steps out, but using tickadj, to slew at > +/-500ppm, typically, but seems to have no concept of frequency.
The devices that I am talking about probably do not use this reference implementation, and if they do they probably have heavily modified it as they underlying "OS" does not have tickadj. _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
