On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 05:14 UTC, David L. Mills <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for the test. I verified the same thing. Note that the measured > offset at the end of the frequency measurement phase was very small, so the > net frequency measurement should be the same as Solaris. Obviously, FreeBSD > is doing something very different than Solaris. I suspect Linux is doing > something completely different as well. At this point I am prepared to > abandon the mission entirely, as I don't want to get bogged down with the > specifics of each idiosyncratic operating system. Accordingly, I will back > out all the changes and revert to the bad old ugly algorithms.
That is disappointing but I understand your frustration. I was hoping the remainder returned by adjtime() would allow ntpd to know exactly how much the OS had in fact slewed the clock, adapting to differing adjtime() implementations. Cheers, Dave Hart _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
