Pranay Kumar Srivastava wrote:
In our NTP client-server setup which is done locally, we've 3 servers each made to synchronize with its own local clock only.
If you have more than one free running server (synchronised with local clock really means not synchronised at all, but claiming to be), it is unlikely that the error bounds for them will overlap.
In your case, you have about 140 microseconds of error bound due to potential network asymmetry, and there will be a few milliseconds added for other reasons, but the times differ by 100s of seconds. There are therefore no two clocks that could possibly be reflecting the same underlying time.
If you must run a free running system, you must have exactly one free running machine, and then synchronise everything else to that. That means either one machine configured with the "local clock" as a pseudo source, or none, but using orphan mode to select one source.
The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only.
Not if you post them to a public mailing list, gatewayed to a usenet group. Why should anyone believe future postings in more marginal circumstances are confidential?
_______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
