David Woolley <[email protected]> wrote: > Hal Murray wrote:
> >> OK. I asked since a timewarp of 200ms is a bit surprising for > >> real HW, but is something to be expected if you were running in a > >> VM. > > > > It's easy to get a time-warp of 200 ms on a DSL link. Just > > download a huge file, say a CD. The queuing delay on the input to > > the DSL link turns into asymmetrical delays. I've seen delays up > > to 3.5 seconds. > The huff and puff tinker optin can help mitigate this. And if the bufferbloat folks are successfull, there should be further mitigation from the reduction in queuing delays. http://www.bufferbloat.net/ rick jones -- It is not a question of half full or empty - the glass has a leak. The real question is "Can it be patched?" these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway... :) feel free to post, OR email to rick.jones2 in hp.com but NOT BOTH... _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
