03.08.2011 23:42, Dave Hart пишет:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 13:41 UTC, Valera<[email protected]>  wrote:
I did undef SO_TIMESTAMP for ntpd and execute again. The situation has
improved, because I see that offset calculates correctly. But I'm not sure
that the time is adjusted.
I have next information from ntpq utility:

# /home/mpi/bin/ntpq -p 10.251.16.22
      remote           refid      st t when poll reach   delay   offset
jitter
==============================================================================
  10.251.231.1    167.206.1.30     3 u    5   64  377    7.252   13.031
1.329
# /home/mpi/bin/ntpq -p 10.251.16.22
      remote           refid      st t when poll reach   delay   offset
jitter
==============================================================================
  10.251.231.1    167.206.1.30     3 u   49   64  377    8.143   11.555
1.103
uname -a returns the next:

# uname -a
Linux SamSTB 2.6.18-5.0 #4 Tue Feb 1 04:12:29 KST 2011 97459b0 unknown
That is improvement.  SO_TIMESTAMP has worked for most people using
Linux for ages, so either your embedded platform managed to break it,
or your configure is not being run on the embedded platform and you're
guessing/providing the wrong cross-compilation options to configure
and getting something inappropriate in config.h

When you say you're not sure time is being synched, you are making me
feel like I'm doing your homework.  I wanted to suggest for you to
move this discussion to the programming-oriented
[email protected], but hesitate because you could use the help of
[email protected] to understand how to interpret ntpq -p output.

I didin't see any software errors and any reasons to move this discussion to the programming-oriented section.
The clock _definitely is not_ being synched because the first column
of the ntpq -p output is not showing a * to indicate 10.251.231.1 is
selected as the time source.  To further diagnose why, it is not
productive to pore over your debug output log when ntpq will do.  Try:

ntpq -c rv -p -c "rv&1" 10.251.16.22

The output of "rv&1", the peer variables for your box's single
source, will include a "flash=" that will tell you why the source is
not being selected.

I got the next result for command.

   # /home/mpi/bin/ntpq -c rv -p -c "rv &1" -c as 127.0.0.1
   associd=0 status=c016 leap_alarm, sync_unspec, 1 event, restart,
   version="ntpd 4.2.7.box Mon Aug 1 16:27:31 UTC 2011 (4)",
   processor="97459b0", system="Linux/2.6.18-5.0", leap=11, stratum=16,
   precision=-19, rootdelay=0.000, rootdisp=28.155, refid=INIT,
   reftime=00000000.00000000  Thu, Feb  7 2036  6:28:16.000,
   clock=d1e53cc3.7f6a4011  Thu, Aug  4 2011 15:44:03.497, peer=0, tc=3,
   mintc=3, offset=0.000, frequency=0.000, sys_jitter=2.142,
   clk_jitter=0.002, clk_wander=0.000
remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter
   
==============================================================================
10.251.231.1 167.206.1.30 3 u 53 64 377 6.220 225.121 2.142
   associd=41168 status=9024 conf, reach, sel_reject, 2 events, reachable,
   srcadr=10.251.231.1, srcport=123, dstadr=10.251.16.22, dstport=123,
   leap=00, stratum=3, precision=-18, rootdelay=17.044, rootdisp=17.303,
   refid=167.206.1.30,
   reftime=d1e53bdc.c94bb80b  Thu, Aug  4 2011 15:40:12.786,
   rec=d1e53cd2.159a4162  Thu, Aug  4 2011 15:44:18.084, reach=377,
   unreach=0, hmode=3, pmode=4, hpoll=6, ppoll=6, headway=202, flash=00 ok,
   keyid=0, offset=224.975, delay=6.742, dispersion=0.996, jitter=2.075,
   xleave=0.252,
filtdelay= 6.74 6.22 5.93 7.60 7.05 6.79 8.38 7.79, filtoffset= 224.97 225.12 225.34 226.58 226.68 226.86 228.15 228.27, filtdisp= 0.01 1.03 2.06 3.10 4.13 5.15 6.19 7.18

   ind assid status  conf reach auth condition  last_event cnt
   ===========================================================
      1 41168  9024   yes   yes  none    reject   reachable  2

I saw the strange fields refid=INIT,reftime=00000000.00000000 Thu, Feb 7 2036 6:28:16.000, but I think that it related to disabled ssl option in config.h(embedded linux didn't have crypto library). flash field has the ok status
But this situation observed only for this device. From other pc:

   associd=0 status=0615 leap_none, sync_ntp, 1 event, clock_sync,
   version="ntpd [email protected] Wed Aug  3 15:37:34 UTC 2011 (19)",
   processor="i686", system="Linux/2.6.38-10-generic", leap=00, stratum=4,
   precision=-20, rootdelay=143.078, rootdisp=50.982, refid=10.251.231.1,
   reftime=d1e52a79.eb3c019b  Thu, Aug  4 2011 18:26:01.918,
   clock=d1e52a9a.7a932bc5  Thu, Aug  4 2011 18:26:34.478, peer=13053,
   tc=10, mintc=3, offset=2.909, frequency=26.002, sys_jitter=14.629,
   clk_jitter=7.429, clk_wander=0.603
remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter
   
==============================================================================
*10.251.231.1 167.206.1.30 3 u 33 1024 377 134.152 2.909 14.629
   associd=13053 status=961a conf, reach, sel_sys.peer, 1 event, sys_peer,
   srcadr=10.251.231.1, srcport=123, dstadr=192.168.19.21, dstport=123,
   leap=00, stratum=3, precision=-18, rootdelay=8.926, rootdisp=16.769,
   refid=167.206.1.30,
   reftime=d1e5288e.b7c49d1b  Thu, Aug  4 2011 18:17:50.717,
   rec=d1e52a79.eb3c019b  Thu, Aug  4 2011 18:26:01.918, reach=377,
   unreach=0, hmode=3, pmode=4, hpoll=10, ppoll=10, headway=25,
   flash=00 ok,
   keyid=0, offset=2.909, delay=134.152, dispersion=16.195, jitter=14.629,
   xleave=0.063,
filtdelay= 134.15 136.52 133.31 174.25 142.91 130.30 143.06 130.57, filtoffset= 2.91 2.51 -1.56 -25.68 -10.43 -4.83 -13.22 -9.86, filtdisp= 0.01 15.59 31.21 47.48 63.50 79.81 96.11 111.88

   ind assid status  conf reach auth condition  last_event cnt
   ===========================================================
      1 13053  961a   yes   yes  none  sys.peer    sys_peer  1


As you are relying on me to teach you how to troubleshoot ntpd and
help you port it to an embedded platform, e.g. have not done your
homework, expect me to have declining interest in helping you.  I am a
volunteer and I have to feed myself too, so I'm not going to do your
job for you and let you collect the pay.


Thanks a lot for teaching. I'm not surethatmanywill get forthis job,buttheprofitscanbuy youa beer. I'm just tryingto usethis listas a resourcefor sharing experiences,and nottocarry out myorders
Cheers,
Dave Hart

_______________________________________________
questions mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions

Reply via email to