Hi Dave and all

Il 11/10/2011 21:17, Dave Hart ha scritto:
> I suspect not,

I had some IRC chat yesterday (my post was on hold for a while, and I
was too curious to wait :)

In short, mlichvar thinks I hit bug 1671, which was fixed in 4.2.7 and
should therefore be fixed in the next stable release.

Do you agree?


> my guess is something changed in the network to reduce
> the delay. 

Not sure, it could be...


> Assuming you are not using "broadcastdelay" in your
> ntp.conf,

I am not.


> each multicast client association starts off with a unicast
> "volley" which measures the unicast and broadcast round-trip delay and
> stores the difference to correct future broadcast/multicast delays for
> that association.  ntpd must be restarted to go through the dance
> again to pick up changes in the network unicast and broadcast latency.

OK, thanks. I never realized that, in multicast mode, delays were
"fixed" after the volley.


> FYI, if you were to use manycastclient instead of multicastclient,
> you'd preserve the automatic server discovery while each client would
> be using unicast exchanges with the server, where the delay is
> determined with each exchange independently, insulating against
> network changes.

Thanks. Manycast is for sure something I want to try. But I want to
re-read the NTP docs first ;) It's such a long time since I did it last
time, that I am far too much behind!

Ciao
-- bronto
_______________________________________________
questions mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions

Reply via email to