On Dec 1, 4:03 am, Rob <[email protected]> wrote: > Rich <[email protected]> wrote: > > Someone is "at war" with USNO NTP service. They could be students, > > who knows? But all of the offending addresses traced to Chinese > > sites. In order to continue to provide NTP to US customers, USNO > > elected to block Chinese networks at the /8 level whenever we were > > able to trace the attacks to those networks. Note that there are > > 2,605 known Chinese CIDR blocks. It takes some time to implement that > > block list, and it requires considerable horsepower. When it comes > > to making a choice between staying online and denying USNO NTP to > > China, we must unfortunately make the more secure choice. > > Yeah, sure. > But where you went over the line is when you recommended others to > do the same. Your local solutions to your particular problems are > not to be recommended to be used by the rest of the world.
I declare that all newsgroup trolls, i.e. those who post > 500 postings in a month, [email protected], Sept. 2010, MUST follow all of my recommendations! We must not have anarchy! Rich _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
