thanks for reply. Yes, this is my problem that address is allocated for ipv4 address, so i can't see my complete ipv6 address, and i am not able to know that what is complete ipv6 address of server i am synced with ( like in this case, i am synced with server 2001:5b0:3eff:fffa::310 while i see only 2001:5b0:3eff:f as output of ntpq -p) . I there any other way to know the server i am synced with.
Regards, Atul. On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 11:34 AM, unruh <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2012-05-21, Atul Gupta <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, >> I am running my ntpd in ipv6 multicast mode, below is my conf file :- >> >> multicastclient ff05::101 >> disable auth >> driftfile /var/log/ntp/drift >> logfile /var/log/ntp/ntp.log >> >> I am syncing with ntp server whose ip is :- 2001:5b0:3eff:fffa::310 >> , which i can verify through my ntp logs ( below ) :- >> receive: at 8364 ff05::101<-2001:5b0:3eff:fffa::310 mode 5 len 48 >> clock_filter: n 8 off -0.015410 del 0.000000 dsp 0.000960 jit 0.006433 >> select: combine offset -0.015410374 jitter 0.006432542 >> clock_update: at 8364 sample 8364 associd 16381 >> local_clock: offset -0.015410000 jit 0.009358219 freq 8.668 stab 0.061 poll 6 >> receive: at 8430 ff05::101<-2001:5b0:3eff:fffa::310 mode 5 len 48 >> clock_filter: n 8 off -0.020993 del 0.000000 dsp 0.000959 jit 0.006987 >> select: combine offset -0.020992699 jitter 0.006987410 >> clock_update: at 8430 sample 8430 associd 16381 >> local_clock: offset -0.020993000 jit 0.008973546 freq 8.585 stab 0.064 poll 6 >> >> But, when i run ntpq program to check the ntp status, i get following out >> out :- >> >> # ntpq -p >> remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset >> jitter >>============================================================================== >> *2001:5b0:3eff:f LOCAL(0) 11 m 17 64 376 0.000 8.151 >> 25.053 >> >> It seems that ipv6 address doesn't accommodate completely in this, >> that's why i see incomplete ipv6 address ( 2001:5b0:3eff:f ), is there >> a way to fix this issue. > > What is the issue? What do you need help for and why? Is it aesthetic? > V6 addresses are too long for the V4 space alloted to addresses in the > output, so they are truncated. But why is this a problem? > > >> >> Please help!!! >> >> Regards, >> Atul. > > _______________________________________________ > questions mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
