Yeechang Lee wrote: > So everyone should use pool.ntp.org? No 0., 1., 2., > or ch., ca., us. prefixes?
I don't see any significant reason not to use those, with country / region prefixes. <http://www.pool.ntp.org/en/use.html> > What about the distribution-specific prefixes, like > 0.centos.pool.ntp.org? Are they also obsolete? Those are the same as 0.pool.ntp.org AFAIK; they just help the pool track vender usage, and perhaps curtail abuse easier. -- E-Mail Sent to this address <blackl...@anitech-systems.com> will be added to the BlackLists. _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
