From: David Taylor <[email protected]> Newsgroups: comp.protocols.time.ntp Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: <[email protected]> References: <[email protected]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Injection-Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 14:20:48 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="ec31590fbbc62faa9d891a3130cd48b3"; logging-data="16018"; mail-complaints-to="[email protected]"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/Pm6PeTV41cwl14zYLOt6UYAjE0vnVoDQ=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> Cancel-Lock: sha1:CrjUPOPLRIPb3uJkVQQWf0UsLUk= X-Received-Bytes: 2102 To: [email protected] Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 15:20:48 +0100 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:4f8:fff7:1::4 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: [email protected] X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [email protected] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on mail1.ntp.org X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MISSING_DATE, MISSING_FROM, MISSING_HEADERS, MISSING_MID, MISSING_SUBJECT, RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail1.ntp.org) Subject: Re: [ntp:questions] NTP on local networks X-BeenThere: [email protected] X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: [email protected] List-Id: "Mailing list for people with questions about NTP \(gatewayed to the USENET newsgroup comp.protocols.time.ntp\)" <questions.lists.ntp.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ntp.org/options/questions>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.ntp.org/pipermail/questions> List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]> List-Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: [email protected] Sender: [email protected] X-pstn-neptune: 0/0/0.00/0 X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 CV:99.9000 FC:95.5390 LC:95.5390 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:97.0282 C:98.6951 ) X-pstn-dkim: 0 skipped:not-enabled X-pstn-settings: 4 (1.5000:1.5000) s cv gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[email protected]> [294/10]
On 30/07/2012 16:47, Will Shackleford wrote: > > We have several computers with several different operating systems on a > local network with no radios and no internet connection. > The main goal is to keep them synchronized with each other. [] > Just for my own curiosity, why is just refusing to do what the operator > wants the default behavior for clients/peers? Why not always > synchronize as well as you can with whichever peers/hosts you can contact? Are you using Orphan mode? http://support.ntp.org/bin/view/Support/OrphanMode http://lists.ntp.org/pipermail/questions/2007-October/015661.html http://fixunix.com/ntp/68214-new-orphan-mode.html (a duplicate?) Hope that helps. -- Cheers, David Web: http://www.satsignal.eu _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
