Jeffrey Lerman wrote: > Can anyone demonstrate whether ntpd clears the bit if it > is set but an upstream server is configured and sends an > LI=00 update?
See: ntp_proto.c & ntp_timer.c ? ... and platform dependent stuff ? nt_clockstuff.c e.g. "Disarm leap second only if the leap second is not already in progress" Dev ver of the moment: <http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~ntp/ntp_spool/ntp4/ntp-dev/ntp-dev-4.2.7p292.tar.gz> -- E-Mail Sent to this address <[email protected]> will be added to the BlackLists. _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
