Your reply and assumptions are so dumb and senseless that you don't deserve any further replies.
Go live your miserable life! On 09/08/2012, at 14:57, unruh <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2012-08-08, Miguel Barbosa Gon?alves <[email protected]> wrote: >> Done! >> >> $ ntpq -pn tick; ntpq -pn tock >> remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter >> ============================================================================== >> o127.127.20.0 .GPS. 0 l 7 16 377 0.000 -0.011 >> 0.004 >> +10.0.2.9 .GPS. 1 u 4 16 377 0.171 -0.007 >> 0.004 >> -194.117.9.130 194.117.9.137 2 u 21 64 377 18.067 0.461 >> 0.278 >> -194.117.9.136 194.117.9.138 2 u 2 64 377 19.012 0.704 >> 0.363 >> +193.136.5.16 193.136.250.246 2 u 53 64 377 17.044 0.378 >> 0.212 >> +193.136.5.14 193.136.250.246 2 u 12 64 377 22.082 -0.089 >> 0.456 >> remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter >> ============================================================================== >> o127.127.20.0 .GPS. 0 l 9 16 377 0.000 -0.009 >> 0.002 >> +10.0.2.8 .GPS. 1 u 10 16 377 0.176 0.008 >> 0.004 >> -194.117.9.130 194.117.9.137 2 u 56 64 377 18.259 0.397 >> 0.229 >> -194.117.9.136 194.117.9.138 2 u 46 64 377 18.941 0.644 >> 0.295 >> +193.136.5.16 193.136.250.246 2 u 26 64 377 17.308 0.313 >> 0.270 >> +193.136.5.14 193.136.250.246 2 u 22 64 377 21.547 0.079 >> 0.369 >> >> Is this enough? > > Enough of what? > > Remind me never to give you help when you ask. > > You gave no information in your original posting-- neither information > oabout your system or your ntp setup. All he did was ask for that > information and yhou blow up. > >> >> Now really, if you don't want to answer don't. >> >> I simply asked if someone had NTP and this particular receiver >> working. What so difficult about this question? If you don't have any >> experience with it don't bother to reply! > > You were asking for help. I suspect if someone had replied "yes, I have > this receiver and it is working" you would have blown up as well. > > >> >> I have been using NTP since 1996, maintaining a stratum 2 server in a >> University. So there... this is my experience! >> >> And quite frankly my main Internet connection is sooo asymmetric that >> NTP behaves badly for my purposes and therefore I have to route NTP >> packets through a DSL connection. >> >> For this reason and not to depend on pool servers I want to install a >> third reference. > > Good reason. > >> >> By the way, you should have received a reply like the one you gave me >> when you were having problems with your Oncore receiver and a lot of >> people helped. > > > Ah, so it was not just a question about other people's setups-- > you wanted help as well. >> >> Now... If you don't have anything positive to add just shut up! > > He did have something positive. He pointed out to you that you need to > give information if you want useful help. > > I am glad you got it working on your own. Certainly this response is an > example of how to get help from others. > > >> >> Miguel Gon?alves >> >> >> On 8 August 2012 20:40, Chris Albertson <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Miguel Barbosa Gon?alves <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> After converting RS-422 to RS-232 what do I need to with on the NTP side? >>> >>> >>> First, install NTP and get it working using Internet Pool servers. >>> >>> After that, come back and ask about adding the new GPS. Also it would help >>> to know which operating system you are using (Linux, BSD, ...?) and how you >>> have the PPS connected. >>> >>> Chris Albertson >>> Redondo Beach, California > > _______________________________________________ > questions mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
