Mischanko, Edward T wrote: > ntpq> peers > remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter > ======================================================================== > #XXX.XXX.0.1 XXX.XXX.104.1 4 u 81 256 377 1.229 -0.089 1.032 ... > #na-mc-ads01v.mi XXX.XXX.250.248 4 u 189 256 377 1.530 -0.315 3.858 > ntpq> rv > associd=0 status=0615 leap_none, sync_ntp, 1 event, clock_sync, > version="ntpd [email protected] Dec 18 15:57:25.96 (UTC-06:00) 12 (1)", > processor="x86", system="Windows", leap=00, stratum=5, precision=-19, > rootdelay=17.559, rootdisp=157.869, refid=XXX.XXX.121.1, > reftime=d47cefe7.6ab0443f Wed, Dec 19 2012 20:01:11.416, > clock=d47ceff7.50f120f0 Wed, Dec 19 2012 20:01:27.316, peer=30980, tc=8, > mintc=3, offset=-0.157823, frequency=1.480, sys_jitter=0.148133, > clk_jitter=0.383, clk_wander=0.023, tai=35, leapsec=201207010000, > expire=201212280000, ctr_frequency=-1.68 > ntpq> > > Notice individual selected peers have positive offsets, > but my clock offset after averaging is negative?
Try something like: ntpq -clas -clpe -c "rv &0" -c "rv &1" -c "rv &2" -c "rv &3" -c "rv &4" -c "rv &5" -c "rv &6" -c "rv &7" -c "rv &8" -c "rv &9" -c "rv &10" -c "rv &11" -c "rv &12" -c "rv &13" -c "rv &14" -c "rv &15" -c "rv &16" -c "rv &17" -c "rv &18" -c "rv &19" -c "rv &20" -c "rv &21" -c "rv &22" -c "rv &23" -c "rv &24" -c "rv &25" -c "rv &26" -c "rv &27" -c "rv &28" -c "rv &29" and look at the filtoffset(s) -- E-Mail Sent to this address <[email protected]> will be added to the BlackLists. _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
