What do these messages say, if anything, about the passage of time on the system?
5 Feb 17:30:40 ntpd[27435]: kernel time sync enabled 2001 5 Feb 18:56:03 ntpd[27435]: kernel time sync enabled 6001 5 Feb 19:13:08 ntpd[27435]: kernel time sync enabled 2001 5 Feb 21:46:51 ntpd[27435]: kernel time sync enabled 6001 5 Feb 22:03:55 ntpd[27435]: kernel time sync enabled 2001 6 Feb 00:03:25 ntpd[27435]: kernel time sync enabled 6001 6 Feb 00:20:29 ntpd[27435]: kernel time sync enabled 2001 6 Feb 01:11:45 ntpd[27435]: kernel time sync enabled 6001 6 Feb 01:28:50 ntpd[27435]: kernel time sync enabled 2001 6 Feb 03:11:14 ntpd[27435]: kernel time sync enabled 6001 6 Feb 03:28:20 ntpd[27435]: kernel time sync enabled 2001 6 Feb 06:01:56 ntpd[27435]: kernel time sync enabled 6001 6 Feb 06:18:59 ntpd[27435]: kernel time sync enabled 2001 6 Feb 08:52:43 ntpd[27435]: kernel time sync enabled 6001 6 Feb 09:09:47 ntpd[27435]: kernel time sync enabled 2001 6 Feb 12:17:40 ntpd[27435]: kernel time sync enabled 6001 6 Feb 12:34:45 ntpd[27435]: kernel time sync enabled 2001 It is a system with which I do not have much familiarity - for example I don't know what version of NTP is running there :( I do know though that it is a Citrix netscaler, but I don't know what version of Citrix bits are running there. I ask because I have a packet trace which shows behaviour that would be consistent with time stepping backwards and am looking to confirm/refute the hypothesis. Pointers to a FAQ entry or a Fine Manual (tm) would be great. thanks, rick jones -- Don't anthropomorphize computers. They hate that. - Anonymous these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway... :) feel free to post, OR email to rick.jones2 in hp.com but NOT BOTH... _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
