John Hasler wrote:
Robert Scott writes:
So I am trying to achieve 12 ppm frequency calibration by developing a
temporary local time stamp that is disciplined by SNTP.  I figure two
SNTP samples about 2 to 4 hours apart will give the required frequency
accuracy, assuming typical SNTP jitter.

I don't see why this should be better than (or even as good as) using
the system clock as disciplined by NTP.

It isn't, as long as the system is running a true NTPD implementation instead of a bunch of sawtooth SNTP adjustments...

Terje
--
- <Terje.Mathisen at tmsw.no>
"almost all programming can be viewed as an exercise in caching"

_______________________________________________
questions mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
  • Re: [ntp:quest... Robert Scott
    • Re: [ntp:... E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists
    • Re: [ntp:... unruh
      • Re: [... E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists
        • R... Robert Scott
        • R... E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists
        • R... E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists
        • R... E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists
        • R... Robert Scott
        • R... John Hasler
        • R... Terje Mathisen
        • R... E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists
        • R... unruh
        • R... E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists
        • R... David Woolley
        • R... Robert Scott
        • [... Ivan Shmakov
        • R... unruh
        • R... Robert Scott
        • R... unruh
        • R... robert bristow-johnson

Reply via email to