On 2013-11-22, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
> I have just written a PHC driver for NTP and tested it on this system:
> Supermicro SYS-50150EHF-D525 which has a pair of  Intel 82574L NICs which
> have IEEE 1588 hardware-based timestamping. I'm using NTP dev 4.2.7p397 on 
> Linux kernel 3.12 with linuxptp. One of the PHCs is sync'd via PTP to an FEI 
> Zyfer Gsync GrandMaster, which is in turn synced via 5MHz to the USNO Master 
> Clock #2. 
>
> I'm running ptp4l to sync PHC1 to the GrandMaster. Then NTP is reading the 
> refclocks PHC0, PHC1 and an NTP server on the LAN ptp2:
>
> ntpq -p
>      remote           refid      st t when poll reach   delay   offset  jitter
>==============================================================================
> +PHC(0)          .PTP.            0 l   15   16  377    0.000    0.000   0.000
> *PHC(1)          .PTP.            0 l    2   16  377    0.000   -0.001   0.000
> +ptp2            .IRIG.           1 u   38   64  377    0.123    0.018   0.007
>
> After about 15 hours the loopstats shows a s.d. of +/- 0.579 microsec with 
> peak-peak 2.52 microsec  (3,073 points).  Very superb. 
>
> However, it took fully 75 minutes at start to converge.  It took that long to 
> remove 20ms of phase error.  I have never seen such a slow convergence. Very 
> smooth too.  I have tested the NMEA/ATOM drivers on this system and the 
> convergence was the normal few minutes.  Any suggestions? Can email plots.

David Mills has always stated that rate of convergence is not a problem
he cares about at all. Stability of running is. ntpd is NOT designed to
converge quickly. If you want faster convergence ( and better clock
discipline although possibly slightly higher drift noise) use chrony. 
Certainly a SD of .5us is far better than any standard PC can get from
an interrupt driven stratum 0 source due to
interrupt latency fluctuations. I am surprized you can get such good
results from a NIC based solution (even with hardware timestamping).
 
>
> Rich Schmidt
> Time Service Dept
> US Naval Observatory

_______________________________________________
questions mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions

Reply via email to