On 03/12/2013 00:34, Brian Inglis wrote:
[]
BTDT, but we all still need decent network servers as check and backup
in case
there are ref clock issues - we don't all have an in house NTP Server
farm! ;^>

Yes, having good Internet servers as a backup or check is desirable, if not mandatory. I recall that in the early days with Windows before all the interpolation and other improvements were added to NTP I was plotting offsets on a +/- 100 ms scale - that's how bad it was.

If someone can only use Internet servers, it's better to have a small (e.g. Raspberry Pi) Linux or FreeBSD local server, or perhaps a Windows 8.1 box, syncing to the Internet, and to which the Windows PCs are synced with a small poll interval (say 32 seconds). For the RPi alone:

  http://www.satsignal.eu/ntp/Raspberry-Pi-NTP.html#results

I've not tried Windows directly taking its time from the Internet for quite a while except on holiday, when I saw offsets in the 10 -25 millisecond range, and averaged jitter up to 30 milliseconds. This through whatever Wi-Fi connections were available. The offset did converge, though. Poll interval started at 64, but never got higher than 256 seconds over a couple of hours of use.

Hope that helps.
--
Cheers,
David
Web: http://www.satsignal.eu

_______________________________________________
questions mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions

Reply via email to