Terje Mathisen <[email protected]> wrote: > David Woolley wrote: > > In this article, which also appeared in the paper version this > > morning, they suggest that normal NTP time requests result in a much > > larger response than the request. > > > > http://metro.co.uk/2014/02/11/the-start-of-ugly-things-to-come-hackers-flood-european-servers-in-biggest-computer-attack-of-its-kind-4300395/ > > > > > There was no comment section for that article and no documented way to > reach the author so I gave up on sending in a correction. :-(
They have one of those annoying "infinite scroll" things, but if you zip all the way to the bottom, it might "stick" and there will be a Contact Us link pointing at http://metro.co.uk/2014/02/11/useful-numbers-2-4164977/ which has a fair number of email addresses. I suspect that one or more of them would be apropos. rick jones -- I don't interest myself in "why." I think more often in terms of "when," sometimes "where;" always "how much." - Joubert these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway... :) feel free to post, OR email to rick.jones2 in hp.com but NOT BOTH... _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
