Martin Burnicki wrote: > Dowd, Greg wrote: >> Why not? You really want to as the network entries will >> do iburst and get selected before your refclock does >> and force some clock stepping before settling down. >> I usually use maxpoll 4 as well. The decreased jitter >> in the local signal makes higher poll rates both >> valid and useful. > > I'd also suggest to use iburst also for refclocks. > However, if I remember correctly then at least some > refclock drivers are acting anyway as if iburst had > been specified.
<http://bugs.ntp.org/show_bug.cgi?id=767> -- E-Mail Sent to this address <[email protected]> will be added to the BlackLists. _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
