"Jason Rabel" writes: > Charles Swiger wrote: > > Don't bother using more than one iburst entry per server. > > I think your wording is a little confusing. Are you saying only use > iburst on one remote server and not all of them?
I'm curious about this as well. iburst is your friend. > I was reading the NTP docs last night and came across a couple > interesting notes. First it says not to use iburst with peer lines. The assoc.html page says: The <tt>burst</tt> and <tt>iburst</tt> options should not be used in symmetric modes, as this can upset the intended symmetry of the protocol and result in spurious duplicate or dropped messages. At one point I remember that FLAG_IBURST was ignored for peers, but I don't see that now from a quick glance at the code. -- Harlan Stenn <[email protected]> http://networktimefoundation.org - be a member! _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
