On 2014-10-17 04:08, Rob wrote: > David Taylor <david-tay...@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid> wrote: >> On 17/10/2014 04:25, Phil W Lee wrote: >> [] >>> Can I upgrade by just swapping a newer binary in? >>> I'm not really far enough up the FreeBSD learning curve to work out >>> why I'm getting errors trying to build a newer one from source (I did >>> at least try). >> >> I've put the Intel binaries I am currently using here: >> >> http://www.satsignal.eu/ntp/FreeBSD-ntp.4.2.7p476.zip >> >> Be sure to take a backup of your own binaries first! No promises, but >> perhaps nothing ventured, nothing gained? > > I know that this is not fixed in ntp-dev. It was mentioned by someone > here when I discussed the problems of using ATOM in combination with > a network clock source, the trouble with "prefer" etc. > > He had a patch that fixed both the "prefer" problem and the bug this > thread is about.
That would be me. I don't have a patch as you might think of one (running a patch against source) but I do have the edits noted. I'm still using an older development version p270 so I really can't submit a patch anymore but I can certainly explain where the edits should go. _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
