David Woolley wrote:
On 03/11/14 14:37, Rob wrote:
You probably mean "locally connected GPS sources" where Martin means
"NTP servers with local GPS sources on the local network". Those are
not heavily preferred over remote NTP servers, just as Martin describes,
at least in the production version of ntpd.
They should still have a low delay and low jitter, so should get
preferred over the remote servers when it comes to throwing out servers
because there are too many.
This is exactly what I had expected, too, but the problem was this did
*not* happen, and the 4 servers installed on remote sites showing high
jitter *did* overvote the 2 server installed on the local network which
provided much lower jitter but a different offset than the remote servers.
Martin
--
Martin Burnicki
Meinberg Funkuhren
Bad Pyrmont
Germany
_______________________________________________
questions mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
