On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Rob <[email protected]> wrote: > Ok but why do I need to remove the "nopeer" and "noquery" restrictions > for a pool member? This does not appear to be necessary for a "server". >
Apparently restrict source was added a few years ago. It applies to association creating objects and apparently the local host's routable addresses. However you only need to remove nopeer. > > Or is there some implicit restrict line for a server that is not there > for a pool member? > The rationale for "restrict source" implies there might be. I have no direct experience since I don't have that problem to solve. > (it was my impression that "noquery" limits status queries, not time > queries, and that "nopeer" is affecting only "peer" directives) > No. Recall that "peer" is ambiguous and depends on context to disambiguate. _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
