Rob writes: > Harlan Stenn <st...@ntp.org> wrote: > > Martin Burnicki writes: > >> IMO the best approach would be to detect this at runtime. > > > > That means we'd need a header file... > > > > If I'm not mistaken (and it's getting late for me), if the header file > > is missing we don't expect the API. If the header file is present we > > expect it to "do the right thing" and even then we check error returns > > from the API. > > But the problem is the file is normally not there, even when the API is.
No, the problem is that it's not normally there on *linux* boxes where the file is maintained in a separate package. It *is* provided by the other OSes that implement this API. H _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
