William Unruh wrote:
> It is one of those pissing matches.
> Ntp thinks the os should provide timepps.h,
> while the others think ntpd should provide it if they need it.
> As a result the users get screwed while the self-righteous
> can continute in glory. Just like with cdrecord.
I would have guessed its more likely a timepps.h
License term issue? Perhaps timepps.h GNU General Public
License v2 terms conflict with some other lic,
method of distribution, or export restrictions?
{e.g. why OpenSSL isn't included with NTP.}
--
E-Mail Sent to this address <blackl...@anitech-systems.com>
will be added to the BlackLists.
_______________________________________________
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
