Paul <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Rob <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Terje Mathisen <[email protected]> wrote: >> > it would seem to >> > be a nice NTPD startum 1 server. >> >> Of course, it could still be good enough when you want to use it as a >> network time server. >> > > Which is what was suggested. After all this is an NTP list not a high > resolution timing list.
It was suggested as "a high-perf NTP server" and it could turn out that it does not perform at maximum performance for NTP. I achieve much better sync between Intel systems over ethernet than I have seen on some of those new tiny Linux boards. But it has to be evaluated. _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
