Sander Smeenk wrote:
Hi,

On a system that has been running for quite some time now i find that
the ntpq output looks like this:

|      remote           refid      st t when poll reach   delay   offset jitter
| ==============================================================================
|  nscache1.dmz.bi 213.136.0.252    2 u  585 1024  377    0.614    0.058 0.310
|  nscache2.dmz.bi 213.136.0.252    2 u  774 1024  377    0.414    0.116 4.459
|  ntp3.dmz.bit.nl 213.136.0.252    2 u   21 1024  377    1.039    0.172 0.521
| *ntp4.bit.nl     .PPS.            1 u  620 1024  377    0.701    0.126 0.131
|
.....
Can someone please explain why the first three peers are in 'condition:
reject' and wether or not this will recover automaticaly? The poll,
reach, delay, offset and jitter values do not seem way out of hand to
me. Why is ntpd not syncing to the three peers?

I'm fairly certain it will sync to them when i restart the process, but
for now i'll leave it like this...


Hi

$ ntpq -4 -p me6000e
     remote        refid    st t poll reach  delay  offset jitter
                                  (s)         (ms)    (ms)   (ms)
=================================================================
*GPS_NMEA(2)  .GPSb.         7 l   64  377   0.000  -1.786  7.863
oPPS(2)       .PPSb.         0 l   16  377   0.000   0.000  0.004
+mail0.lordy  81.187.61.78   3 u   64  377   0.801  -0.006  0.416
+mail.lordyn  81.187.61.78   3 u   64  377   0.869   0.010  0.509
+ns3.lordyne  81.187.61.78   3 u   64  377   1.309  -0.209  0.481
 e350n1b.hom  192.168.59.61  2 u   64  377   0.459   0.014  0.586
 me6000g.hom  192.168.59.61  2 u   16  377   0.480   0.001  0.597
 p3x1300.hom  192.168.59.61  2 u   64  377   0.317   0.356  0.544
+xxxxxxxxxxx  195.66.241.2   2 u  256  377  18.087  -1.466  0.365

E350n1b, me6000g and p3x1300 can't be selected because they
are all synced to me6000e.

You possibly need to add at least one extra independent ntp
source.


David

_______________________________________________
questions mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions

Reply via email to