Jan Ceuleers wrote:
I'd like to draw this list's attention to an idea that Reyk Floeter
floated, namely to use TLS to help sanity-check NTP timestamps:
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=142356166731390&w=2
Isn't public/private signed timestamps far better?
If you can't get that, and are too cheap to spend $100 on a GPS based
refclock, then I agree that a HTTPS timestamp would avoid huge jumps.
Terje
--
- <Terje.Mathisen at tmsw.no>
"almost all programming can be viewed as an exercise in caching"
_______________________________________________
questions mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
