Thanks all for your comments, but if that's expected , I need to depend on something other than the system / peer status words for trapping the correct sequence of events? what I mean is even when my server is not reachable and system status word rv 0 = 0615 ..it means to the client (0 leap_none, 6- sync_ntp,1 event, 5-clock_sync).. and only after 7 to 8 minutes rv 0 status changes and gives the correct status that the "server peer" is unreachable, same with the client associations status: only after 6 to 8 minutes client shows it has lost the server peer ( not reachable) ..am I missing something here ?
thanks, Shyam On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Sowmya Manapragada <skoga...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks all for your comments, but if that's expected , I need to depend on > something other than the system / peer status words for trapping the > correct sequence of events? > what I mean is even when my server is not reachable and system status word > rv 0 = 0615 ..it means to the client (0 leap_none, 6- sync_ntp,1 event, > 5-clock_sync).. and only after 7 to 8 minutes rv 0 status changes and > gives the correct status that the "server peer" is unreachable, same with > the client associations status: only after 6 to 8 minutes client shows it > has lost the server peer ( not reachable) ..am I missing something here ? > > thanks, > Shyam > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 5:30 PM, <questions-requ...@lists.ntp.org> wrote: > >> Send questions mailing list submissions to >> questions@lists.ntp.org >> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >> http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >> questions-requ...@lists.ntp.org >> >> You can reach the person managing the list at >> questions-ow...@lists.ntp.org >> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >> than "Re: Contents of questions digest..." >> >> >> Today's Topics: >> >> 1. Re: Observation with ntp4.2.8@p4-request inputs (brian utterback) >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Message: 1 >> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 08:01:14 -0500 >> From: brian utterback <brian.utterb...@oracle.com> >> To: elliott...@comcast.net, "'Sowmya Manapragada'" >> <skoga...@gmail.com>, questions@lists.ntp.org >> Subject: Re: [ntp:questions] Observation with ntp4.2.8@p4-request >> inputs >> Message-ID: <5669779a.7040...@oracle.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 >> >> Yes, that is the expected behavior. >> >> On 12/10/2015 6:55 AM, Charles Elliott wrote: >> > FWIIW, I have seen a similar phenomenon, only with one server. If the >> time >> > server on my network stops dispensing time for some reason, the >> computers on >> > the LAN will still stay sync'ed to its last observation long after the >> reach >> > indicator goes to zero. Not sure if that is right. >> > >> > Charles Elliott >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: questions >> > [mailto:questions-bounces+elliott.ch=comcast....@lists.ntp.org] On >> Behalf Of >> > Sowmya Manapragada >> > Sent: Wednesday, December 9, 2015 10:26 PM >> > To: questions@lists.ntp.org >> > Subject: [ntp:questions] Observation with ntp4.2.8@p4-request inputs >> > >> > Hello All, >> > Just wanted to check if what I am observing with4.2.8p4 is as expected >> or I >> > missed out something because I don't see this with older 4.2.8p2/p3 :I >> have >> > a client having 2 NTP servers (both servers in my LAN ), client makes >> one as >> > a peer ( to which it is currently synced) and other as a candidate; the >> peer >> > (server) goes down, my client at least waited 7 to 8 min to reject this >> peer >> > server and choose the available one... Checked in Mein berg monitor tool >> > also and rv0 command ... The status word just don't show that client >> > rejected server until 7 to 8 minutes... Wire shark correctly shows no >> > packets exchanged between my clint and peer ( right from moment when >> server >> > which is down)..my client ntp.conf is standard with an iburst... >> > Thanks in advance >> > Shyam >> > _______________________________________________ >> > questions mailing list >> > questions@lists.ntp.org >> > http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > questions mailing list >> > questions@lists.ntp.org >> > http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions >> >> -- >> Oracle <http://www.oracle.com> >> Brian Utterback | Principle Software Engineer >> Phone: +1 6038973049 <tel:+1%206038973049> >> Oracle Systems/RPE Solaris Network >> 1 Oracle Dr. | Nashua, NH 03062 >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> All working systems eventually start to exhibit their own agenda >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Green Oracle <http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to >> developing practices and products that help protect the environment >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Subject: Digest Footer >> >> _______________________________________________ >> questions mailing list >> questions@lists.ntp.org >> http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> End of questions Digest, Vol 134, Issue 7 >> ***************************************** >> > > _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
