On 2021-06-08, Roger <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote: > On Tue, 8 Jun 2021 08:30:31 -0700 (PDT), ProGeek ><progee...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>Hope that will make the score higher > > Excuse me for my rudeness but forget the bloody scores. You need > to concentrate on having low offsets for months at a time. Look > at these two servers which are both using GPS. > > https://www.pool.ntp.org/scores/212.159.133.83 > https://www.pool.ntp.org/scores/185.57.191.229 > > Look at the left hand axes; 16 to -4 ms for the first, 0.2 to > -0.6 ms for the second. Your graphs range from 2 to -2 seconds. > Both servers are currently showing an offset of 500 ms. Useless > to the pool at present. Once your offsets are good the scores > will automatically be good.
Actually for GPS discipline, the offsets should be much better than 1ms. It should be more like 1us, ie 1000 times better. Of course much of the trouble could be due to connection problems between the machine and Newark NJ which is trying to measure the offset (but even then 1ms seems like a lot). _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
