On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 09:43:43AM +1000, Martin Thomson wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020, at 06:36, Dmitri Tikhonov wrote: > > Assuming that mandating the 4-byte encoding is what's intended. Or is it > > rather a "do not truncate" rule (which is also Christian's reading)? > > It's "don't truncate". That is, don't send a packet number using an > encoding that would drop a bit that is set. If you do, the other side > (probably [1]) won't be able to read it.
I misread the spec, then -- thankfully (no code change). Thank you, - Dmitri.
