Hey, On Sat, 3 Oct 2020, 01:09 Christoph Paasch, <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello Lucas, > > > "could hurt end users", you mean consume significant cellular data? Or do > you mean hurt performance? > If it is the former, I agree. And that's why the client should not > establish > a uniflow unless it actually is willing to receive data on that uniflow. > Yes I meant this former case. And by using the term end user I was very much channeling RFC 8890. I doubt there is a specific reason on why the MP-QUIC draft does not have > such an "MP_PRIO"-concept. In any case, that would be a minor point that > can > easily be added. > Thats a good suggestion, I think adding something on this would help. Cheers Lucas >
