Hey,

On Sat, 3 Oct 2020, 01:09 Christoph Paasch, <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello Lucas,
>
>
> "could hurt end users", you mean consume significant cellular data? Or do
> you mean hurt performance?


> If it is the former, I agree. And that's why the client should not
> establish
> a uniflow unless it actually is willing to receive data on that uniflow.
>

Yes I meant this former case. And by using the term end user I was very
much channeling RFC 8890.

I doubt there is a specific reason on why the MP-QUIC draft does not have
> such an "MP_PRIO"-concept. In any case, that would be a minor point that
> can
> easily be added.
>

Thats a good suggestion, I think adding something on this would help.

Cheers
Lucas


>

Reply via email to